vaulttaya.blogg.se

Audio hijack vs sound siphon
Audio hijack vs sound siphon










audio hijack vs sound siphon
  1. #AUDIO HIJACK VS SOUND SIPHON HOW TO#
  2. #AUDIO HIJACK VS SOUND SIPHON DRIVERS#
  3. #AUDIO HIJACK VS SOUND SIPHON MANUAL#
  4. #AUDIO HIJACK VS SOUND SIPHON PRO#
  5. #AUDIO HIJACK VS SOUND SIPHON SOFTWARE#

I know how to do that, it's just getting around to the bother. (I've been considering setting up Aux mixed monitoring, so each person in studio can have a custom mix. I'll also need monitor outputs for my cans. I'll also need a demux'ed output that I can edit and master for on-demand use. That's all going through the mixers 4 group outs to the 18i8's 5-8 analog ins, leaving me its 1-4 inputs for general purpose needs. I need to send my PC audio out separately from my mixer outputs which is handling my mics, phone hybrid, iPad, and misc input sources (as needed). In this case, it's a matter of supporting my teleconferencing for work. I do have specific tasks to accomplish, but I've always been one of those people who has to learn the subject, not just follow a recipe.

audio hijack vs sound siphon

hashtag-facepalmĪs to your latter? It's actually both. Yeah, it's "only" gen 2, but one of the reasons I got it was in case I ever needed to do a SPDIF loopback. It's not so much a recommendation, but knowledge and experience with the technologies that I'm seeking. I'd really like to hear from someone who has worked with both. I've searched, but have not been able to find a head-to-head comparison of the two. I'm assuming both will work equally well. I will, most likely, be also mixing and routing OBS through Voicemeeter in order to feed telecon and Focusrite outputs, as well as potential recording of live streams.

#AUDIO HIJACK VS SOUND SIPHON PRO#

My real concern is which works best with regards to things like reliability, latency, etc? It's a huge concern that any option has to "play nice" with OBS, my Focusrite drivers, the onboard Realtek audio, and everything from Pro Tools to Reaper to Audacity. Less cost, but more limited in the number of available patches.

audio hijack vs sound siphon

The second are the VB-Cable A+B and C+D from VB-Audio, the same guys that make Voicemeeter. It costs a bit more than the alternative, but provides effectively unlimited virtual cables. What to watch for? What are the gotchas? etc.įirst there's Muzichenko's original VAC. I'm curious about any advice and or experience running virtual cables. This is new for me, though I have plenty of experience with real-world patching on sound systems, as well as being very comfortable technically (engineer on the day job).

#AUDIO HIJACK VS SOUND SIPHON MANUAL#

Check the manual of your interface to see if it support this.I'm needing to run some virtual audio cables for some internal patching in my computer. Tip: Certain audio interfaces have loopback capabilities built in, so you don't even need to use physical cables. Configure the respective preferences so that one program is outputting via the digital out, and the other is set to receive the digital input. If you have ADAT you can do the same for 8 channels of loopback. If you have SPDIF input and output ports, connect a cable between them for stereo loopback. This option has the advantage of potentially lower latency than other two other options above. If you have a spare output on your audio interface, connect a cable (or set of cables) from there to an input on the same interface. Configure the respective preferences so that one program is outputting via the analog out, and the other is set to receive the analog input. Start recording into a blank clip slot, and press play on the Youtube video.Arm an audio track for recording, then set the monitor to receive the correct input:.Select iShowU Audio Capture as the input device:.Launch Live, then open Preferences → Audio.Set the Output device to iShowU Audio Capture:.Open your Mac's System Preferences → Sound.Here's an example of how to route audio from a Youtube video into Live to record it using iShowU on Mac:

#AUDIO HIJACK VS SOUND SIPHON DRIVERS#

Once installed, these show up as audio drivers in Live's preferences (as well as the preferences of other audio-enabled applications). Here are some popular options:įollow the instructions for installation. Various virtual audio-routing protocols exist for Windows and Mac.

#AUDIO HIJACK VS SOUND SIPHON SOFTWARE#

We can not offer support regarding problems related to the use of such software in combination with Live and will have to ask you to contact the manufacturer in that case. Note: Routing audio between applications with third-party software can cause audio dropouts and other technical issues. Routing audio can be used for things like, for example, sampling audio from video into Live or sending SMPTE sync out of Live. There are three common methods for routing audio between Live and other software on your computer.












Audio hijack vs sound siphon